Stochastic error and biases remain in blind wine ratings
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Analyses and aggregations of the ratings that wine critics judges assign to wines are made difficult by stochastic error biases remain even when assessed blind price, label, capsule, closure. Stochastic is due partially random nature ratings. Cognitive omitted-variable anchoring, expectation, serial position, commercial, other factors. Differences in decanting, filtering, aeration, temperature can also affect
منابع مشابه
Predicting wine ratings using linear models
In this paper I analyze reviews taken from a popular wine review website. I use linear regression to tune a model suited for predicting wine ratings. I compare a two models and select the best one with the best parameters using k fold cross validation. The results indicate that better predictions come from using more of the features, rather than less of them. This suggests that both the age of ...
متن کاملFood Recommendations: Biases that Underpin Ratings
The context in which preference information is gathered from users is recognised as one of the important factors in generating user models. Much research has been carried out into sensing and recording the physical and environmental contexts of user interactions, and it was shown that these affect the derived user modelling data. In this talk we introduce a new facet of context called a Reasoni...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Wine Economics
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1931-4361', '1931-437X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2022.53